Does not remove a person, it is not in his control, it is menstruation and postpartum bleeding.
And regarding this, there are two narrations from Malik.
The well-known of them is the permissibility of reciting the Quran.
For women who are menstruating and those in postpartum bleeding. This is the well-known view, and this is what I told you. Shaykh Khalil, may Allah have mercy on him, said: It is permissible for teachers and students, even if she is menstruating.
So her menstruation does not prevent her from reciting the Quran, and even from touching the part, and some scholars have even said that it is permissible for her to hold the mushaf.
However, I believe that it is better, especially since parts of the Qur'an are easily available, for the menstruating woman to suffice with these parts and not carry the mushaf, out of respect for the mushaf.
This is contrary to the three imams who treat the woman in postpartum bleeding like someone in a state of major impurity, and they see that the one in major impurity, the menstruating woman, and the woman in postpartum bleeding.
Are the same, because each of them must perform ghusl; he is in a state of major impurity and is someone without wudu due to a major cause, and he must perform ghusl.
But we say they are not the same.
The one in major impurity, his state can be removed whenever he wishes.
But her state, how can she remove it? And her menstruation, how can she lift it? It cannot be lifted, even if she were to wash herself until her skin peels.
No, no, no, she does not remove it, her state does not end, so comparing the menstruating woman to the one in a state of major impurity is a flawed analogy, and there is no clear evidence.
It prevents the menstruating woman from reciting the Quran, so the stronger view is what he adopted.
The Malikis hold this view, and it is also the choice of a group outside of them; this is the opinion chosen by Shaykh al-Islam Ibn Taymiyya, may Allah have mercy on him, and it was also chosen by al-Shawkani, who is not from the Malikis.