There are those who say that the method.

And the approach of Shaykh Rabee' ibn Hadi and Shaykh Muhammad Aman.

is different from the approach of the two shaykhs.

Shaykh Ibn Baz and Shaykh Ibn Uthaymeen.

So what is your comment on this statement? First, every Muslim must know what is the methodology by which people are judged.

Whether in acceptance or rejection, praise or criticism, it is not the methodology of so-and-so or so-and-so among the scholars of this era or others.

Rather, as Shaykh al-Islam, may Allah have mercy on him, said in al-Aqidah al-Wasitiyyah, and he means the people of the sunnah.

They weigh with these three principles, meaning the Book, the sunnah, and what the salaf agreed upon.

He said, they weigh all that people have of statements and actions, inward or outward, that are related to the religion.

So we do not make a person and say, this is his methodology by which we measure people.

Rather, it is the methodology of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ, and these two imams became prominent in the umma and among the people of the sunnah: the two scholars Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymin.

Only because they followed the path of the righteous predecessors.

Allah the Exalted has granted success to the scholars organizing such gatherings by holding two complete sessions about the two shaykhs, may Allah have vast mercy on them both.

The second point: she accused me of her own fault and then slipped away.

If you want to know who opposes the way of the salaf, and thus,

he is also opposing the way of the two shaykhs because they followed the way of the salaf, then look at their fatwas.

And in these great issues and tribulations present in this era.

Such as organizations, parties, groups, revolutions, demonstrations, coups, and rebellion.

And the so-called jihad and similar matters, and the stance on allegiance and those who differ in giving the legitimate allegiance to the Muslim rulers, as you find recorded.

In those two previous episodes, then you look at who is truly not following the methodology.

May Allah have mercy on the two shaykhs. The third matter: how can it be, and how can Shaykh Rabee' and Shaykh Muhammad Aman.

May Allah have mercy on those who have passed away, and may Allah grant success and guidance to those who remain, grant them a good ending, keep them firm, and reward them with the best reward for Islam and the sunnah.

How can they be upon their methodology while you are more protective over Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen than Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen themselves? Allah did not take the souls of these two great scholars.

Ibn Baz and Ibn Uthaymeen, except that they were either individually.

Both of these great scholars, Rabee' al-Madkhali and Aman al-Jami, may Allah have mercy on him, Muhammad Aman,

Ibn Ali al-Jami, may Allah have mercy on him. The recommendations of Ibn Baz are confirmed for each of them.

And the recommendations of Ibn Uthaymeen are confirmed for the scholar Rabee' al-Madkhali, may Allah preserve him.

And in the clearest and strongest terms you will hear in this era, when he said: I only say as Ishaq or Ahmad said when asked.

Ahmad or Ishaq is asked about me, but I am not asked about him.

And this is among the most eloquent things you will hear in this era, so how can it be said that they are not upon the methodology of the two sheikhs? This is a broad and general claim, and this is among the methods.

The people of desires and innovations use generalizations, vague statements, and absolute terms. Specify five issues for me.

Six issues, numerical points, leave aside exaggeration.

Leave aside causing trouble, leave aside nonsense, leave aside deceiving people's minds.

Leave aside using vague terms, for by Allah, you will be questioned about them before Allah. Give me five or six specific issues from the methodology of Ahl al-Sunnah that Shaykh al-Madkhali and Shaykh al-Jami follow.

Then bring their opposites from the biography of the two shaykhs, and show with Islamic evidence how the two shaykhs opposed the Book of Allah, the sunnah of His Messenger, and the way of the salaf.

And what the two great scholars Ibn Baz, may Allah have mercy on him, and.

Ibn Uthaymeen, may Allah have mercy on them all, there is no doubt that such statements first establish in people's hearts the blameworthy blind following that those scholars used to fight against.

And it establishes in people's hearts the bonds of loyalty and disavowal based on a person's methodology, then they claim that the Salafis have made loyalty and disavowal for their own group, and I would like to point out that it may happen.

That someone defends Muhammad Aman al-Jami alone, but avoids Shaykh Rabee', because Shaykh Muhammad Aman, his efforts are well known.

And his struggle against the groups is well known, and he was among the first to do that, but also, do not forget, he has passed away.

In the year 1416, but the living one.

Whose blows are feared, whose criticisms are feared, whose words are feared, is Shaykh Rabee', and for this reason, they do not raise their heads. Someone visits Shaykh Rabee'.

Even if he has a Twitter account with thousands of tweets, he never mentions Rabi' even once. But if they visit Rabi', they say, "Today we visited Rabi', he fed us, we ate, we drank, and we left."

Glory be to Allah the Almighty. This is the same exploitation as the people of desires.

Or you find some of them defending the two shaykhs, and they mention Rabi' only as a follower, not independently.

So they mention the two shaykhs either in opposition to the political groups.

Or the Ash'aris or a soefi, and that's just so it can be recorded for them or with them. Allah knows his intention, but outwardly it looks like taking a stance.

Against these groups, so the point is that the innocence of the two shaykhs from innovations and desires is something witnessed for them, and that they are leading the way, and this is an honor for them.

They follow the path of the salaf before the path of Ibn Baz and al-Uthaymin.

According to the way of the salaf, and then according to the way of the imams like Malik, al-Shafi'i, and Ahmad.

And the authors of the books, Ibn Taymiyya, Ibn Abd al-Wahhab and his students, and according to the way of the scholars of our time.

The great imams like al-Albani, Ibn Baz, al-Uthaymin, al-Najmi, and other prominent figures—this is one of the claims they made. Learn, listener.

Learn that when someone makes such general statements, you should say: Give me a number of issues and clarify them for me with evidence and proofs.

That they opposed the path of the salaf, and then knowingly and with certainty opposed the path of the two shaykhs.