He says: What is the ruling on the guardianship of the maternal uncle in marriage if there is no male agnate?

No, the maternal uncle is not a guardian in marriage.

The maternal uncle is not a guardian in marriage. Guardianship is for the father, then the grandfather, then the son.

There is a difference of opinion on whether the son takes precedence over the father or not.

Then after that, the brother's son, then the full brother, then the paternal brother.

Then the full paternal uncle, then the paternal uncle through the father, then, excuse me, the full brother's son, then the paternal brother's son, then the full paternal uncle, then the paternal uncle through the father, then the uncle.

Then the paternal cousin, and so on, these are the 'asaba.

These are the 'asaba, but the maternal uncle and the maternal brother,

These are not 'asaba, they are not allowed to give her in marriage.

So if this woman does not have a father, nor a grandfather, nor a son, nor a grandson, nor a full brother, nor a nephew from a full brother, nor a paternal brother, nor a nephew from a paternal brother, nor a paternal uncle, nor a paternal cousin,

here the judge marries her off, the judge becomes her guardian, not the maternal uncle.

The maternal uncle is not a guardian. Yes, even the maternal grandfather is not a guardian.

The maternal grandfather is not a guardian, this is the basic rule, yes.

He is the one who carries the name, carries his name.

Meaning, the one who has the same name as you, he is a guardian: the father, the son of the brother, the nephew, the paternal uncle, the son of the paternal uncle from the father's side. But the son of the paternal uncle from the mother's side, no, he is not a guardian.